<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yingjie Hu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Krzysztof Janowicz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Carral</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simon Scheider</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Werner Kuhn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gary Berg-Cross</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pascal Hitzler</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mike Dean</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dave Kolas</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Geo-ontology Design Pattern for Semantic Trajectories</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spatial Information Theory - 11th International Conference, COSIT 2013, Scarborough, UK, September 2-6, 2013. Proceedings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ontology Design Pattern</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OWL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trajectory</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_24</style></url></web-urls></urls><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">438–456</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Trajectory data have been used in a variety of studies, including human behavior analysis, transportation management, and wildlife tracking. While each study area introduces a different perspective, they share the need to integrate positioning data with domain-specific information. Semantic annotations are necessary to improve discovery, reuse, and integration of trajectory data from different sources. Consequently, it would be beneficial if the common structure encountered in trajectory data could be annotated based on a shared vocabulary, abstracting from domain-specific aspects. Ontology design patterns are an increasingly popular approach to define such flexible and self-contained building blocks of annotations. They appear more suitable for the annotation of interdisciplinary, multi-thematic, and multi-perspective data than the use of foundational and domain ontologies alone. In this paper, we introduce such an ontology design pattern for semantic trajectories. It was developed as a community effort across multiple disciplines and in a data-driven fashion. We discuss the formalization of the pattern using the Web Ontology Language (OWL) and apply the pattern to two different scenarios, personal travel and wildlife monitoring.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Carral</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simon Scheider</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Krzysztof Janowicz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Charles Vardeman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adila Krisnadhi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pascal Hitzler</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philipp Cimiano</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Óscar Corcho</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Valentina Presutti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laura Hollink</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sebastian Rudolph</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An Ontology Design Pattern for Cartographic Map Scaling</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, 10th International Conference, ESWC 2013, Montpellier, France, May 26-30, 2013. Proceedings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Map Scaling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ontology Design Patterns</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OWL</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_6</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7882</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76–93</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The concepts of scale is at the core of cartographic abstraction and mapping. It defines which geographic phenomena should be displayed, which type of geometry and map symbol to use, which measures can be taken, as well as the degree to which features need to be exaggerated or spatially displaced. In this work, we present an ontology design pattern for map scaling using the Web Ontology Language (OWL) within a particular extension of the OWL RL profile. We explain how it can be used to describe scaling applications, to reason over scale levels, and geometric representations. We propose an axiomatization that allows us to impose meaningful constraints on the pattern, and, thus, to go beyond simple surface semantics. Interestingly, this includes several functional constraints currently not expressible in any of the OWL profiles. We show that for this specific scenario, the addition of such constraints does not increase the reasoning complexity which remains tractable.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>