<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michelle Cheatham</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pascal Hitzler</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter Mika</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tania Tudorache</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abraham Bernstein</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris Welty</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Craig A. Knoblock</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denny Vrandecic</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul T. Groth</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Natasha F. Noy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Krzysztof Janowicz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carole A. Goble</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conference v2.0: An uncertain version of the OAEI Conference benchmark</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">benchmark</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OAEI</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ontology Alignment</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Riva del Garda, Italy</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8797</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148-163</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative is a set of benchmarks for evaluating the performance of ontology alignment systems. In this paper we re-examine the Conference track of the OAEI, with a focus on the degree of agreement between the reference alignments within this track and the opinion of experts. We propose a new version of this benchmark that more closely corresponds to expert opinion and confidence on the matches. The performance of top alignment systems is compared on both versions of the benchmark. Additionally, a general method for crowdsourcing the development of more benchmarks of this type using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk is introduced and shown to be scalable, cost-effective and to agree well with expert opinion.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raghava Mutharaju</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philippe Cudré-Mauroux</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jeff Heflin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evren Sirin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tania Tudorache</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jérôme Euzenat</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manfred Hauswirth</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Josiane Xavier Parreira</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">James A. Hendler</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Guus Schreiber</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abraham Bernstein</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eva Blomqvist</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Very Large Scale OWL Reasoning through Distributed Computation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2012), Proceedings, Part II</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Distributed Reasoning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ontology Classification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OWL EL</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35173-0_30</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Boston, MA, USA</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7650</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">407–414</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p class=&quot;rtejustify&quot;&gt;Due to recent developments in reasoning algorithms of the&amp;nbsp;various OWL profiles, the classification time for an ontology has come&amp;nbsp;down drastically. For all of the popular reasoners, in order to process&amp;nbsp;an ontology, an implicit assumption is that the ontology should fit in&amp;nbsp;primary memory. The memory requirements for a reasoner are already&amp;nbsp;quite high, and considering the ever increasing size of the data to be&amp;nbsp;processed and the goal of making reasoning Web scale, this assumption&amp;nbsp;becomes overly restrictive. In our work, we study several distributed&amp;nbsp;classification approaches for the description logic EL+ (a fragment of OWL 2 EL profile). We present the lessons learned from each approach, our current results, and plans for future work.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kunal Sengupta</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adila Krisnadhi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pascal Hitzler</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lora Aroyo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris Welty</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harith Alani</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jamie Taylor</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abraham Bernstein</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lalana Kagal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Natasha F. Noy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eva Blomqvist</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Local Closed World Semantics: Grounded Circumscription for OWL</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Semantic Web - ISWC 2011 - 10th International Semantic Web Conference, Bonn, Germany, October 23-27, 2011, Proceedings, Part I</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7031</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">617-632</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We present a new approach to adding closed world reasoning to the Web Ontology Language OWL. It transcends previous work on circumscriptive description logics which had the drawback of yielding an undecidable logic unless severe restrictions were imposed. In particular, it was not possible, in general, to apply local closure to roles. In this paper, we provide a new approach, called grounded circumscription, which is applicable to SROIQ and other description logics around OWL without these restrictions. We show that the resulting language is decidable, and we derive an upper complexity bound. We also provide a decision procedure in the form of a tableaux algorithm.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>