@conference {748, title = {Pseudo-Random ALC Syntax Generation}, booktitle = {The Semantic Web: ESWC 2018 Satellite Events - ESWC 2018 Satellite Events, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 3-7, 2018, Revised Selected Papers}, volume = {11155}, year = {2018}, pages = {19{\textendash}22}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Heraklion, Crete, Greece}, abstract = {We discuss a tool capable of rapidly generating pseudo-random syntactically valid ALC expression trees. The program is meant to allow a researcher to create large sets of independently valid expressions with a minimum of personal bias for experimentation.}, keywords = {ALC, Description Logic, DL, random generation, synthetic data}, isbn = {978-3-319-98191-8}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-98192-5\_4}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98192-5\_4}, author = {Aaron Eberhart and Michelle Cheatham and Pascal Hitzler} } @proceedings {606, title = {Explaining Trained Neural Networks with Semantic Web Technologies: First Steps}, journal = {Twelveth International Workshop on Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning, NeSy}, year = {2017}, month = {07/2017}, edition = {12}, address = {London, UK}, abstract = {

The ever increasing prevalence of publicly available structured data on the World Wide Web enables new applications in a variety of domains. In this paper, we provide a conceptual approach that leverages such data in order to explain the input-output behavior of trained artificial neural networks. We apply existing Semantic Web technologies in order to provide an experimental proof of concept.

}, keywords = {Artificial Intelligence}, url = {http://daselab.cs.wright.edu/nesy/NeSy17/}, author = {Md Kamruzzaman Sarker and Ning Xie and Derek Doran and Michael Raymer and Pascal Hitzler} } @article {61, title = {Paraconsistent OWL and Related Logics}, journal = {Semantic Web}, volume = {4}, year = {2013}, pages = {395{\textendash}427}, abstract = {The Web Ontology Language OWL is currently the most prominent formalism for representing ontologies in Semantic Web applications. OWL is based on description logics, and automated reasoners are used to infer knowledge implicitly present in OWL ontologies. However, because typical description logics obey the classical principle of explosion, reasoning over inconsistent ontologies is impossible in OWL. This is so despite the fact that inconsistencies are bound to occur in many realistic cases, e.g., when multiple ontologies are merged or when ontologies are created by machine learning or data mining tools. In this paper, we present four-valued paraconsistent description logics which can reason over inconsistencies. We focus on logics corresponding to OWL DL and its profiles. We present the logic SROIQ4, showing that it is both sound relative to classical SROIQ and that its embedding into SROIQ is consequence preserving. We also examine paraconsistent varieties of EL++, DL-Lite, and Horn-DLs. The general framework described here has the distinct advantage of allowing classical reasoners to draw sound but nontrivial conclusions from even inconsistent knowledge bases. Truth-value gaps and gluts can also be selectively eliminated from models (by inserting additional axioms into knowledge bases). If gaps but not gluts are eliminated, additional classical conclusions can be drawn without affecting paraconsistency.}, keywords = {Automated Deduction, Complexity, Description Logic, OWL, Paraconsistency, Semantic Web, Web Ontology Language}, doi = {10.3233/SW-2012-0066}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-2012-0066}, author = {Frederick Maier and Yue Ma and Pascal Hitzler} } @proceedings {314, title = {10302 Abstracts Collection - Learning paradigms in dynamic environments}, journal = {Learning paradigms in dynamic environments}, year = {2010}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, keywords = {Autonomous learning, Dynamic systems, Neural-symbolic integration, Neurobiology, Recurrent neural networks, Speech processing}, issn = {1862-4405}, url = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2010/2804}, editor = {Barbara Hammer and Pascal Hitzler and Wolfgang Maass and Marc Toussaint} } @article {83, title = {Computational Complexity and Anytime Algorithm for Inconsistency Measurement}, journal = {International Journal of Software and Informatics}, volume = {4}, year = {2010}, pages = {3{\textendash}21}, abstract = {

Measuring inconsistency degrees of inconsistent knowledge bases is an important problem as it provides context information for facilitating inconsistency handling. Many methods have been proposed to solve this problem and a main class of them is based on some kind of paraconsistent semantics. In this paper, we consider the computational aspects of inconsistency degrees of propositional knowledge bases under 4-valued semantics. We first give a complete analysis of the computational complexity of computing inconsistency degrees. As it turns out that computing the exact inconsistency degree is intractable, we then propose an anytime algorithm that provides tractable approximations of the inconsistency degree from above and below. We show that our algorithm satisfies some desirable properties and give experimental results of our implementation of the algorithm

}, keywords = {algorithm, computational complexity, inconsistency measurement, Knowledge representation, multi-valued logic}, url = {http://www.ijsi.org/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=i41\&flag=1}, author = {Yue Ma and Guilin Qi and Guohui Xiao and Pascal Hitzler and Zuoquan Lin} } @article {78, title = {A Reasonable Semantic Web}, journal = {Semantic Web}, volume = {1}, year = {2010}, pages = {39{\textendash}44}, abstract = {

The realization of Semantic Web reasoning is central to substantiating the Semantic Web vision. However, current mainstream research on this topic faces serious challenges, which forces us to question established lines of research and to rethink the underlying approaches. We argue that reasoning for the Semantic Web should be understood as "shared inference," which is not necessarily based on deductive methods. Model-theoretic semantics (and sound and complete reasoning based on it) functions as a gold standard, but applications dealing with large-scale and noisy data usually cannot afford the required runtimes. Approximate methods, including deductive ones, but also approaches based on entirely different methods like machine learning or natureinspired computing need to be investigated, while quality assurance needs to be done in terms of precision and recall values (as in information retrieval) and not necessarily in terms of soundness and completeness of the underlying algorithms.

}, keywords = {Automated Reasoning, Formal Semantics, Knowledge representation, Linked Open Data, Semantic Web}, doi = {10.3233/SW-2010-0010}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-2010-0010}, author = {Pascal Hitzler and Frank van Harmelen} }