@conference {132, title = {An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns (WOP2014) co-located with the 13th International Semantic Web Conference {(ISWC} 2014), Riva del Garda, Italy, October 19, 2014.}, year = {2014}, pages = {78{\textendash}81}, abstract = {

Activity is an important concept in many fields, and a number of activity-related ontologies have been developed. While suitable for their designated use cases, these ontologies cannot be easily generalized to other applications. This paper aims at providing a generic ontology design pattern to model the common core of activities in different domains. Such a pattern can be used as a building block to construct more specific activity ontologies.

}, keywords = {Activity, Ontology Design Pattern, OWL}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1302/paper8.pdf}, author = {Amin Abdalla and Yingjie Hu and David Carral and Naicong Li and Krzysztof Janowicz} } @conference {130, title = {A Geo-ontology Design Pattern for Semantic Trajectories}, booktitle = {Spatial Information Theory - 11th International Conference, COSIT 2013, Scarborough, UK, September 2-6, 2013. Proceedings}, year = {2013}, pages = {438{\textendash}456}, abstract = {

Trajectory data have been used in a variety of studies, including human behavior analysis, transportation management, and wildlife tracking. While each study area introduces a different perspective, they share the need to integrate positioning data with domain-specific information. Semantic annotations are necessary to improve discovery, reuse, and integration of trajectory data from different sources. Consequently, it would be beneficial if the common structure encountered in trajectory data could be annotated based on a shared vocabulary, abstracting from domain-specific aspects. Ontology design patterns are an increasingly popular approach to define such flexible and self-contained building blocks of annotations. They appear more suitable for the annotation of interdisciplinary, multi-thematic, and multi-perspective data than the use of foundational and domain ontologies alone. In this paper, we introduce such an ontology design pattern for semantic trajectories. It was developed as a community effort across multiple disciplines and in a data-driven fashion. We discuss the formalization of the pattern using the Web Ontology Language (OWL) and apply the pattern to two different scenarios, personal travel and wildlife monitoring.

}, keywords = {Ontology Design Pattern, OWL, Trajectory}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_24}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_24}, author = {Yingjie Hu and Krzysztof Janowicz and David Carral and Simon Scheider and Werner Kuhn and Gary Berg-Cross and Pascal Hitzler and Mike Dean and Dave Kolas} } @conference {129, title = {An Ontology Design Pattern for Cartographic Map Scaling}, booktitle = {The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, 10th International Conference, ESWC 2013, Montpellier, France, May 26-30, 2013. Proceedings}, volume = {7882}, year = {2013}, pages = {76{\textendash}93}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, abstract = {

The concepts of scale is at the core of cartographic abstraction and mapping. It defines which geographic phenomena should be displayed, which type of geometry and map symbol to use, which measures can be taken, as well as the degree to which features need to be exaggerated or spatially displaced. In this work, we present an ontology design pattern for map scaling using the Web Ontology Language (OWL) within a particular extension of the OWL RL profile. We explain how it can be used to describe scaling applications, to reason over scale levels, and geometric representations. We propose an axiomatization that allows us to impose meaningful constraints on the pattern, and, thus, to go beyond simple surface semantics. Interestingly, this includes several functional constraints currently not expressible in any of the OWL profiles. We show that for this specific scenario, the addition of such constraints does not increase the reasoning complexity which remains tractable.

}, keywords = {Map Scaling, Ontology Design Patterns, OWL}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_6}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_6}, author = {David Carral and Simon Scheider and Krzysztof Janowicz and Charles Vardeman and Adila Krisnadhi and Pascal Hitzler}, editor = {Philipp Cimiano and {\'O}scar Corcho and Valentina Presutti and Laura Hollink and Sebastian Rudolph} } @conference {126, title = {A logical geo-ontology design pattern for quantifying over types}, booktitle = {SIGSPATIAL 2012 International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (formerly known as GIS), SIGSPATIAL{\textquoteright}12, Redondo Beach, CA, USA, November 7-9, 2012}, year = {2012}, pages = {239{\textendash}248}, keywords = {Biodiversity, description logics, Ontology Design Patterns, OWL}, doi = {10.1145/2424321.2424352}, url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2424321.2424352}, author = {David Carral and Krzysztof Janowicz and Pascal Hitzler} }